People who are faced with a terminal illness experience just as much emotional turmoil as physical pain. When a person can longer speak, think or act for him or herself, that person has been stripped of their dignity. Sidney Hook is a philosopher, educator and author Seyler Hook has been so unfortunate as to have sampled death and was left with a bitter taste in his mouth. He suffers with congestive heart failure, which one can live with but which if not treated or maintained properly will cause a painful death.
He offers his first hand account of meeting with the Grim Reaper: I lay at the point of death. A congestive heart failure was treated for diagnostic purposes by an angiogram that triggered a stroke. Violent and painful hiccups, uninterrupted for several days and nights, prevented the ingestion of food.
My left side and one of my vocal chords became paralyzed. Some form of pleurisy set in, and I felt like I was drowning in a sea of slime. In one of my lucid intervals during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life-supporting services or show me how to do it.
Hook feels as though he was robbed of the peaceful serenity of death and will have to suffer through it once more, when death comes knocking again. Arguments for and against euthanasia are cause for major debate.
Proponents and opponents disagree on at least four controversial issues. The four major issues are, but not limited to, the nature autonomy, the role of beneficence, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia and the public and social implications of legalization.
The nature of autonomy basically means that all people are granted the right to think, feel and act for him or herself. The distinction between passive and active euthanasia, or killing and allowing one to die. Euthanasia is a serious topic because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. Euthanasia is not always applied to terminally patients either. People who have been in serious accidents, or who have debilitating diseases such as severe cases of Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, and Cerebral Vascular Diseases which lead to strokes and heart attacks are often in consideration for the application of euthanasia.
In other words, these patients cannot act or speak for themselves or in addition, respond to much stimulus. Personal experience and opinion may be a factor that weighs heavily on the issue of euthanasia, but the real substance comes from the facts.
The legal ramifications play a major role in the legalization of euthanasia. Euthanasia began with its roots in both the Hippocratic tradition and the Judeo-Christian ethic of sanctity of life, Western medicine has long opposed the practice of physician-assisted suicide.
However, the controversy over euthanasia is not new. Ohio is the only state in the United States of America that does not explicitly prohibit euthanasia by jurisdiction of the federal law. Caleb Dimitrivich, an oncologist, who most directly works with terminally ill patients at St. Doctors have real difficulty dealing with death. The religious community has taken a negative stance on the issue of euthanasia. The majority of Christian religions ban the application of euthanasia to the terminally ill or PVS patients.
After interviewing Maryanne Chapman who is a practicing member of the Catholic faith and who has also worked as a secretary for 15 years at St. Chapman is trying to say is that for patients suffering with a PVS, it is also a sin to try to sustain a life that has no purpose or function in society.
You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation on Euthanasia argumentative topics at our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers. During the last years, medicine has advanced incredibly; humanity has learned to treat diseases that have killed thousands of people throughout centuries.
However, there still are many sicknesses that not only cannot be cured at present, but also cause incredible suffering to people who have them. Patients with such diseases might want to ask for euthanasia, as life can be torturous for them.
However, societies and laws of different countries trat euthanasia as something immoral and illegal—which is not necessarily right. Terminally sick people who are in extreme pain or suffering should be granted the right to euthanasia. There are numerous diseases that modern medicine cannot cure, and which cause severe pain and suffering to patients. One of such sufferers, Tony Nicklinson, in and was denied his right to die by the British High Court.
The number of patients suffering from this and other diseases, who have no other way to stop their suffering, is uncountable, but they are doomed to live. Is it not unfair that they are not allowed to end this suffering? The opponents of euthanasia claim that helping a person to die is wrong, because one can never know when the cure for a terminal disease will be invented, or when recovery will occur; thus, claim the opponents, euthanasia shortens life spans of patients. In addition, it should be mentioned that sustaining life in a terminally-ill body is cruel.
As it has been mentioned, terminal diseases are usually accompanied by unbearable pain and suffering. At the same time, sometimes it is possible to keep patients alive for months and years, which means they will suffer throughout this period of time.
Is it not similar to torture? Assurances and promises that there will be a cure someday do not deny the fact that doctors and relatives of an ill person consciously keep a patient in pain and humiliation for an undetermined period of time.
As we can see, in some cases, euthanasia is justified. There are diseases that cause severe suffering; sometimes, a patient might try to commit suicide to end this suffering; life for such patients is worse than death.
In addition, keeping a person alive against their will and making him or her withstand pain and suffering is not different from torture, and thus should not be allowed:
Writing a Persuasive Essay A persuasive essay is a form of academic writing that is built around a central argument. These essays are sometimes called argumentative essays because of this.
Jun 28, · Euthanasia is a physician or others ‘killing’ of a suffering patient in attempt to hasten death and alleviate pain. In the game of life and death: life is the most obvious answer one would think. This is not always the case, so euthanasia or assisted suicide is an extremely controversial topic of today.
A persuasive essay is a form of academic writing that is built around a central argument. These essays are sometimes called argumentative essays because of this. In this category of composition, the writer aims to persuade the reader to accept his or her. Euthanasia Persuasive Essay Words | 7 Pages. painful clutch. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are two ways to end the life of a person.
Euthanasia Persuasive Essay terminal illnesses or diseases is too unbearable for the patient to want to live, and they want to be released from the illness’ painful clutch. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are two ways to end the life of a person. Although persuasive, their essay contains numerous fallacies that will be addressed in this essay. In result, the arguments are weakened by said fallacies and lack the persuasive method that the author intended to evoke/5(16).